The following essay was written for an intro to architecture class, where students were required to visit the Nelson Atkins Museum of Art in Kansas City, Missouri, and write an essay describing their personal reaction to the structure and the juxtaposition of old and new architecture between the 1933 Nelson Atkins by Wright and Wright, and the 2007 Bloch addition by Steven Holl.
As you walk north on the south lawn of the Nelson-Atkins museum campus, the Nelson-Atkins building sits in the distance, poised majestically and with great presence and stability over lawn. To the west, just alongside of the 1933, warm buff limestone Nelson-Atkins building is the Bloch addition, which resemble glass boxes covered almost entirely by a frosted glass facade, that run smoothly down the shallowly sloping hill sides of the east campus. The glass of each glass box glisten and twinkle as the sunlight is reflected off the frosted glass facade. These glass boxes in the shallow hill resemble hills themselves. The different roof lines of the buildings resemble the hill crests, and it is as if you are looking out over glass flint hills, as they gently roll into the distance. Though the Bloch addition to the Nelson-Atkins may be made primarily of steel and glass, its form and relation to the setting makes it just as much a part of the natural setting as the shallow hills in which it is built into. As the architect Frank Lloyd Wright once said, “No house should ever be on a hill or on anything. It should be of the hill, belonging to it. Hill and house should live together each the happier for the other.” While the Bloch addition may not be a house, it serves this idea of being true to the environment in which it exists, and does so through its form, rather than materiality.